06 Nov 2007 | 5 comments | insurance | Comments feed
Do you need Insurance Switching?
If you're new here, you may want to subscribe to my RSS feed. Thanks for visiting!
What is insurance switching?
Insurance switching is an industry jargon that’s actually not known to most life insurance agents. If you follow through all my articles about life insurance, you will notice the difference between investment-linked policy (ILP) and traditional policy. For ILP, insurance company charges natural premium, or simply means that the insurance charges increase according to age. But for traditional policy owner, you pay a level premium which is calculated using the age of entry. Insurance switching here means dropping traditional plan to get an ILP or vice versa.
Do you really need to switch insurance?
There are two sides of view, you either switch from traditional plan to ILP, or from ILP to traditional plan.
Switch from Traditional plan to ILP
- some agents advice their potential clients to lapse their existing traditional and buy a new ILP. This is definitely wrong because Bank Negara had imposed a rule that the act of replacing a policy within one year will be penalized. The new policy agent won’t get any commission on the new sale.
- however, there are still some policyholders actually followed the agents’ advice to switch because of the appealing features of an ILP - low premium, high coverage, better health card etc. Why aren’t the agents penalized? This is due to the lack of linking between different insurance companies. There is no such centralized system where company A can track the status of the policy held at company B.
- you must realize that ILPs charges a high insurance cost especially at old age. You are getting the advantage of low insurance charges at young age. ILP is not so appealing to older folks who wants whole life protection on dread diseases. When you reach age 70, the mortality is simply ridiculous that your premium paid is impossible to cope with the ultra high insurance charges.
Switch from ILP to Traditional
- some policy owners thought that ILP is actually for investment. But that’s not true in that terms just because some agents might sell you the investment features of ILP. ILP is designed with integrated insurance features. In fact, ILP is a very effective tool to give comprehensive coverage at low affordable premium especially for younger people.
- when you get older, you might want to consider to actually switch from ILP to traditional plan. The proper way to do that is to reduce the protection on ILP, and buy new traditional plan. Ask your consultants whether the insurance companies provide a guaranteed switch that doesn’t require any health proof. When you reduce your ILP protection, it is not necessary to reduce your premium. Instead, you can take premium holiday and just stop paying premium as long as your investment value is substantial enough.

Photo by 12208732@N00
Image: Which route to take? Should you switch?
Conclusion
1. Buy both policies, traditional and ILP as soon as possible. This ensures that you lock in the best features of both types of policies at the lowest premium affordable at young entry age.
2. Buy ILP if you are young and can’t afford to have both type of policies. Normally for a budget of RM250/month, you can have a decent combination of both. Lower than that, just get the ILP.
3. Buy traditional policy if you are approaching retirement age, and seeking for life and critical illness coverage. Bad investment performance won’t affect your policy status much unlike ILP which depends very much on investment return and your age.
« Does Compound Interest Really Apply to Unit Trust Investment? | Zen To Done: The Simple Productivity E-Book »


thanks for your information. As I never heard of the term insurance switching or may be I have bought ILP in the first place. Quite frankly, I forgot all the details in the first place, e.g how’s the charges, in the young vs old ages etc. your articles remind me these things and I think it will benefit others as well!
hedge fund news - 06 Nov 07 at 1:07 pm
Well actually this is a sad state of affair in Malaysia. Bank Negara think Malaysian public has no knowledge and put such rule into place. What about if the customer is briefed on the pro’s & con’s of switching policy & still want to go ahead? Agents are still penalized.
In the US, as long as the customer knows why he is switching & the agent can show that the product no longer suits the customer, the agent is not penalized.
We should do something like this here too.
Ed - 09 Nov 07 at 11:58 am
I invested in Hong Leong’s Investment-Linked Insurance. The fixed premium I paid each month (RM300) provide not only with life insurance cover but part of the premium will also invest in certain investment funds such as the Blue Chip fund. Is this consider as ILP? It looks to me like an investment fund rather than insurance plan. I was not told that my insurance cost will be higher as I get older, though. But I was told that if anything happens to me, I will get a fixed insurance of RM144,000.
Berd - 08 Jan 08 at 1:15 am
Hi Berd,
It is an investment-linked policy.
KCLau - 08 Jan 08 at 5:55 am